Fechar

1. Identificação
Tipo de ReferênciaArtigo em Revista Científica (Journal Article)
Siteplutao.sid.inpe.br
Código do Detentorisadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S
Identificador8JMKD3MGP3W/48743SE
Repositóriosid.inpe.br/plutao/2022/12.12.17.53   (acesso restrito)
Última Atualização2022:12.13.23.09.40 (UTC) lattes
Repositório de Metadadossid.inpe.br/plutao/2022/12.12.17.53.11
Última Atualização dos Metadados2023:07.08.07.14.39 (UTC) administrator
DOI10.1016/j.srs.2022.100067
ISSN2666-0172
Rótulolattes: 1325667605623244 5 UrbazaevHHSOTDHUAS:2022:AsTeEl
Chave de CitaçãoUrbazaevHHSOTDHUAS:2022:AsTeEl
TítuloAssessment of terrain elevation estimates from ICESat-2 and GEDI spaceborne LiDAR missions across different land cover and forest types
Ano2022
Data de Acesso18 maio 2024
Tipo de Trabalhojournal article
Tipo SecundárioPRE PI
Número de Arquivos1
Tamanho15285 KiB
2. Contextualização
Autor 1 Urbazaev, Mikhail
 2 Hess, Laura L.
 3 Hancock, Steven
 4 Sato, Luciane Yumie
 5 Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud
 6 Thiel, Christian
 7 Dubois, Clémence
 8 Heckel, Kai
 9 Urban, Marcel
10 Adam, Markus
11 Schmullius, Christiane
Grupo 1
 2
 3
 4 DIOTG-CGCT-INPE-MCTI-GOV-BR
 5 DIPE3-COGPI-INPE-MCTI-GOV-BR
Afiliação 1 Friedrich Schiller University Jena
 2 University of California
 3 University of Edinburgh
 4 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
 5 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
 6 German Aerospace Center (DLR)
 7 Friedrich Schiller University Jena
 8 Friedrich Schiller University Jena
 9 Friedrich Schiller University Jena
10 Friedrich Schiller University Jena
11 Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Endereço de e-Mail do Autor 1
 2
 3
 4 luciane.sato@inpe.br
 5 jean.ometto@inpe.br
RevistaScience of Remote Sensing
Volume6
Páginas100067
Histórico (UTC)2022-12-13 23:09:41 :: lattes -> administrator :: 2022
2023-07-08 07:14:39 :: administrator -> simone :: 2022
3. Conteúdo e estrutura
É a matriz ou uma cópia?é a matriz
Estágio do Conteúdoconcluido
Transferível1
Tipo do ConteúdoExternal Contribution
Tipo de Versãopublisher
Palavras-Chaveterrain elevation
accuracy assessment
GEDI
ICESat-2
ResumoAccurate measurements of terrain elevation are crucial for many ecological applications. In this study, we sought to assess new global three-dimensional Earth observation data acquired by the spaceborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) missions Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). For this, we examined the ATLAS/ICESat-2 L3A Land and Vegetation Height, version 5 (20 × 14 m and 100 × 14 m segments) and the GEDI Level 2A Footprint Elevation and Height Metrics, version 2 (25 m circle). We conducted our analysis across four land cover classes (bare soil, herbaceous, forest, savanna), and six forest types (temperate broad-leaved, temperate needle-leaved, temperate mixed, tropical upland, tropical floodplain, and tropical secondary forest). For assessment of terrain elevation estimates from spaceborne LiDAR data we used high resolution airborne data. Our results indicate that both LiDAR missions provide accurate terrain elevation estimates across different land cover classes and forest types with mean error less than 1 m, except in tropical forests. However, using a GEDI algorithm with a lower signal end threshold (e.g., algorithm 5) can improve the accuracy of terrain elevation estimates for tropical upland forests. Specific environmental parameters (terrain slope, canopy height and canopy cover) and sensor parameters (GEDI degrade flags, terrain estimation algorithm; ICESat-2 number of terrain photons, terrain uncertainty) can be applied to improve the accuracy of ICESat-2 and GEDI-based terrain estimates. Although the goodness-of-fit statistics from the two spaceborne LiDARs are not directly comparable since they possess different footprint sizes (100 × 14 m segment or 20 × 14 m segment vs. 25 m circle), we observed similar trends on the impact of terrain slope, canopy cover and canopy height for both sensors. Terrain slope strongly impacts the accuracy of both ICESat-2 and GEDI terrain elevation estimates for both forested and non-forested areas. In the case of GEDI the impact of slope is, however, partly caused by horizontal geolocation error. Moreover, dense canopies (i.e., canopy cover higher than 90%) affect the accuracy of spaceborne LiDAR terrain estimates, while canopy height does not, when considering samples over flat terrains. Our analysis of the accuracy and precision of current versions of spaceborne LiDAR products for different vegetation types and environmental conditions provides insights on parameter selection and estimated uncertainty to inform users of these key global datasets.
ÁreaCST
Arranjo 1urlib.net > CGCT > Assessment of terrain...
Arranjo 2urlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção a partir de 2021 > COGPI > Assessment of terrain...
Conteúdo da Pasta docacessar
Conteúdo da Pasta sourcenão têm arquivos
Conteúdo da Pasta agreementnão têm arquivos
4. Condições de acesso e uso
Idiomaen
Arquivo Alvo1-s2.0-S2666017222000293-main.pdf
Grupo de Usuárioslattes
Grupo de Leitoresadministrator
lattes
Visibilidadeshown
Permissão de Leituradeny from all and allow from 150.163
Permissão de Atualizaçãonão transferida
5. Fontes relacionadas
Unidades Imediatamente Superiores8JMKD3MGPCW/46KUATE
8JMKD3MGPCW/46L2FGP
Lista de Itens Citandosid.inpe.br/bibdigital/2022/04.04.04.47 1
DivulgaçãoPORTALCAPES
Acervo Hospedeirodpi.inpe.br/plutao@80/2008/08.19.15.01
6. Notas
Campos Vaziosalternatejournal archivingpolicy archivist callnumber copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel e-mailaddress format isbn lineage mark mirrorrepository month nextedition notes number orcid parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project resumeid rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarykey secondarymark session shorttitle sponsor subject tertiarymark tertiarytype url
7. Controle da descrição
e-Mail (login)simone
atualizar 


Fechar